Hi Jack,
you just hit issue SLING-588, which has been heavily discussed about but
then was lost track.
I just applied the respective patch.
As a workaround you may also POST to /apps/my.app/ (the trailing slash
is important to have a new node below /apps/my.app created) and add a
field ":name" whose value is the required name of your node.
For example the curl command:
$ curl -F:name=resources -Fjcr:primaryType=nt:folder \
http://host:port/apps/my.app/
will create the /apps/my.app/resources folder.
With the patch from SLING-588 applied, the curl command
$ curl -Fjcr:primaryType=nt:folder \
http://host:port/apps/my.app/resources
should also work.
Hope this helps.
Regards
Felix
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-588
付 尧 schrieb:
> Hi Felix,
>
> I did that in webdav. ;)
> And of course, my.app is a nt:folder. I just use /apps/my.app as an
> example.
>
> thank you for you response.
> -----
> Jack
>
>
>
> 在 2008-10-28，下午7:18， Felix Meschberger 写道：
>
>> Hi Jack,
>>
>> 付 尧 schrieb:
>>> But I went to an error when I try to add a child node to the node that
>>> has an dot in its name.
>>>
>>> Let's suppose this, there is a node /apps/my.app/resources with type of
>>> nt:unstructured.
>>>
>>> When I post a file to the folder, sling post servlet will give me a
>>> surprise of adding the node to /apps/my/resources, just because the
>>> PathIterator behave like that(It takes .app as an extension).
>>
>> I am not sure, whether I understand you. How did you create the
>> /apps/my.app/resources node ? Did you use the SlingPostServlet to create
>> it like this ?
>>
>> POST /apps/my.app/resources ?
>>
>> It might be possible (I cannot exactly remember the code right now) that
>> the SlingPostServlet has a bug creating the required node and cutting
>> off the extension here.
>>
>> If you could list the exact steps you do to try to create your nodes,
>> this might help. Thanks.
>>
>>>
>>> Maybe let the PathIterator check the resource's existence (or escape the
>>> dot in the path?) is the solution here, what do you think?
>>>
>>> Folders has one or more dot for name is so natural to me, cause I'm a
>>> Mac. :)
>>
>> Yes, names with dots should be possible, I agree.
>>
>> Regards
>> Felix
>>
>>
>
>
