Hi, Juan José Vázquez Delgado schrieb: > Hi, > > Agreed. I think if we can present a good use case for the requirement >> (which IMHO is a good requirement in itself) the Jackrabbit team would >> be more sensitive to the issue. >> >> Until now, they have not been that much sensitive to this because they >> are more concerned with support for the upcoming JCR 2.0 (JSR-283) >> standard. >> > > Understand, the first is first. > > >>> Alternatively, you may create your own jackrabbit-server bundle >>>> including your special PersistenceManager (or whatever it is). But I >>>> agree, this is not the best of all solutions. >>> >>> I know, but sure you hate duplicated code, aren´t you? ;) >> I do, of course ;-) >> >> But you could create a bundle, which depends on Sling's >> jcr/jackrabbit-server bundle but extends it. When building the final >> bundle, the jcr/jackrabbit-server bundle stuff would just be included in >> your own bundle, for example by means of the <Embed-Dependency> element >> of the bundle plugin or by using svn:externals (though this would be >> kind of a last ressort IMHO). >> > > Yep, I had already thought about this solution. It could be works. > > Anyway, I´m still thinking about an eventual jackrabbit-server improvement. > Are yoy agree?.
Absolutely, this would be the right way to go. Regards Felix > > BR, > > Juanjo. >
