On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Vidar Ramdal <[email protected]> wrote: > One of the main goals of the application we're developing, is that it > must be dead simple for our users. Our users are NOT computer-savvy in > any way, so they will certainly not be able to grasp the concept of > ACLs. Thus, we'd have to abstract the logic in some > user-understandable manner anyway, and as I've tried to describe, we > think it's easier to describe the rules using Java (or any programming > language, really) than with ACLs.
I wasn't saying that the end-users should fiddle around with a repository explorer and set the basic ACLs themselves - there still must be a GUI for it. But I can understand the need for programmed ACLs, it can often be simpler if you don't need fully-fledged enterprise configuration ... something ;-) Regards, Alex -- Alexander Klimetschek [email protected]
