Personally, I believe that not alienating users is much more important
than either interface, bloat or anything else really.
To keep as many users happy as possible, given how divisive an issue
editors are, I think the best bet is to leave in Nano and vi which are
both major text editors with a large number of fervent followers. Then
for the GUI folks leave either beaver or leafpad. I have personally used
leafpad and enjoyed it, I don't know much about beaver.
- Yori
On 4/27/2011 4:18 PM, Alexander Medvedev wrote:
>save only about 1meg on the iso
That's HUGE.
> it does not provide a replacement for leafpad
We already have beaver.
>it's pico-like keybindings still don't offer an interface that's
anything like nano.
Are we talking of minimal possible bloat or nice interfaces?
---
SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
