Is there anything we can do for 2.0 to improve DDL use cases?

I had sent out a patch a while back that lets EXECUTE SCRIPT take a list of tables to lock (thus not locking everything). I never did get any feedback on the patch. If there is interest I can try to bring it up to the current 2.0 head and resend it.

Do the new was of disabling triggers have any effect on the dangers of doing alter tables outside of an execute script? Is there anything we can do to improve that (at least for DDL where the order it is applied on doesn't need to match on the slaves)


Steve

_______________________________________________
Slony1-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general

Reply via email to