"=?UTF-8?B?Q8OpZHJpYyBWaWxsZW1haW4=?=" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Perhaps somewhere in the documentation, it could be write that in >> case of failover, future master and direct receiver have to be set >> with forward = yes ? > > isn't it write somewhere ?
Yes, it's mentioned in a number of places, but possibly not prominently enough, as confusion has clearly arisen. > In the future, it is possible that every node will be forwarder by > default (isn't it ? ) Some day, quite possibly. I have given up, for now, on the idea of using COPY to handle the data in sl_log_[1/2]; my proposal had some pretty fatal flaws in it. But the idea may eventually return, and if it does, it becomes really necessary to copy over data into sl_log_[1/2], and that would turn each node, potentially, into a forwarder. -- (reverse (concatenate 'string "moc.enworbbc" "@" "enworbbc")) http://www3.sympatico.ca/cbbrowne/finances.html "Thou shall not kill. Thou shall not commit adultery. Don't eat pork. I'm sorry, what was that last one?? Don't eat pork. God has spoken. Is that the word of God or is that pigs trying to outsmart everybody?" -- Jon Stewart _______________________________________________ Slony1-general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
