Marcin Kasperski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anoop Bhat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Centos 5 only comes with 8.1.11 and as a company, we've decided that
>> we'll go with whatever the distro comes with. Makes things easier
>> for management etc.
>
> You must compile the same Slony version on both hosts, so at least
> here you will be forced to lessen this rule.
>
> I succesfully Slony-migrated from 8.1 to 8.3. Don't know about 7.4
We've migrated 7.4 to 8.1; that interoperability has certainly been
one of OUR requirements :-).
In view that there will be a need to compile Slony-I in both
environments, that certainly undermines the "whatever the distro comes
with" argument, at least in part.
I can't see why someone would be keen of keeping on a release that was
obsoleted nearly two years ago (e.g. - 8.2 was released in December
2006), when there exist some quantity of data-eating bugs between 8.1
and 8.3 that will NEVER be addressed in the 8.1 release.
--
output = reverse("moc.enworbbc" "@" "enworbbc")
http://linuxdatabases.info/info/linuxxian.html
Rules of the Evil Overlord #111. "I will offer oracles the choice of
working exclusively for me or being executed."
<http://www.eviloverlord.com/>
_______________________________________________
Slony1-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
