Jan Wieck wrote:
On 12/11/2009 8:32 AM, Brad Nicholson wrote:
On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 11:59 +0000, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
However, I've used 1.2.15 in the past and never had any problems. It
might be prudent to stick to 1.2.* if everything is fine already,
I'd recommend sticking with 1.2.x for now.
I have plans for testing and doing a detailed code review. But it's
going to take some time. At this point I'd second that 2.0 is not ready
for production.
Any ideas on my issue before I scrap it and try 2.0+?
http://lists.slony.info/pipermail/slony1-general/2009-December/010217.html
_______________________________________________
Slony1-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
