Christopher Browne wrote:

> 
> There should be a "chmod" that takes place somewhat automatically; I
> don't want that to be an entry going onto some interminable checklist.

Is there a reason why we don't want to just do a  'chmod +x' on the 
version file in the cvs repo on the server? That why future 
checkouts/exports will have configure with +x ?



-- 
Steve Singer
Afilias Canada
Data Services Developer
416-673-1142
_______________________________________________
Slony1-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general

Reply via email to