On 07/25/2015 12:31 AM, David Fetter wrote: > Folks, > > While in the best of all possible worlds, we'd have planned out a > replication strategy before we get tables whose initial sync via > "SUBSCRIBE SET" will never finish, we aren't always given that much > ability to plan that soon.
One thing I forgot to ask initially. What do you mean by "will never finish"? Is that just being facetious about "it will take a long time", is it that you don't have the disk storage to swallow the back log that will accumulate or is it "outdated knowledge" from the times when Slony did actually slow down with accumulation of backlog? Regards, Jan -- Jan Wieck Senior Software Engineer http://slony.info _______________________________________________ Slony1-general mailing list Slony1-general@lists.slony.info http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
