DaZZa wrote:
> > I will when it is readable. Really great way to cripple the campaign
> > right from the start. If they are this bad with their WWW site, how bad
> > has their testing become.
>
> Must be something wrong with your eyes, Terry - it's perfectly readable to
> me - both the originating page, and the Choice page which it refers you to
> when you "vote".
Well, if Choice tests cars like they do web sites, they'll take it out
for the suburban street (< 60kms aka 640x480) and the priority roads
(<80kms aka 800x600), but some strange reason they will never take it on
an expressway or outside the city (>100kms aka 1024x768+).
Choice has obviously lost the plot. I always though WWW pages were
designed to be about communication, not image. Their page is an image
page lacking technical credibility. Telstra has a similar problem.
Nope - still don't need glass to read the screen (just pretty legs down
the street {:-).
>
> DaZZa
--
Terry Collins {:-)}}} Ph(02) 4627 2186 Fax(02) 4628 7861
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.woa.com.au
WOA Computer Services <lan/wan, linux/unix, novell>
snail: PO Box 1047, Campbelltown, NSW 2560.
"People without trees are like fish without clean water"
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux Users Group Mailing List - http://www.slug.org.au
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe in the text
