So the whole thing could come down to deciding whether or not a protection
method is "effective" as to whether or not the secion will apply???
Hmmm, very subjective.
> >4.25 The Committee recommends that the meaning of circumvention device
> >in item 4 of the Copyright Amendment (Digital Agenda) Bill 1999 be
> >amended to specifically include devices whose primary purpose or use
> >is the circumvention, or facilitating the circumvention, of an effective
------------------------------------------------------------------^^^^^^^^^
> >technological protection measure, and devices which are promoted,
> >advertised, or marketed as having the purpose of circumventing an
> >effective technological protection measure.
---^^^^^^^^^
alan.
--
Alan Hargreaves
Senior Solution Centre Engineer Phone : +61 2 9844 5379
Sun Microsystems Australia Mobile: +61 416 207 573
828 Pacific Highway Fax : +61 2 9418 2143
Gordon, N.S.W. 2072 Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sydney Australia
perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5,(41*2),sqrt(7056),(unpack(c,H)-2),oct(115),10);'
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux Users Group Mailing List - http://www.slug.org.au
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe in the text
