On Wed, 19 Jul 2000, Richard Hayes wrote: > Jason Rennie wrote: > > > > Its odd isn't it that there are these pro-linux companies using other > > platforms for there stuff. > > > > I dont suppose anybody has asked them why this is the case ? > > > > Especially with the likes of RedHat and VA. > > > > With linuxtoday wasn't that acquired by andover.net ? > > > No, Linuxtoday.com is a part of Internet.com I know now their mailing lists run off NT They were on linux before internet.com got to them! so I unsubscribed! but I STILL get the odd jobs newsletter, maybe the unsubscription this time Might auctually work. -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
- [SLUG] Should Linux companies be using Linux exclusively? Jeff Waugh
- Re: [SLUG] Should Linux companies be using Linux exc... Tom Massey
- Re: [SLUG] Should Linux companies be using Linux... Jason Rennie
- Re: [SLUG] Should Linux companies be using L... Richard Hayes
- Re: [SLUG] Should Linux companies be usi... Jeffrey Borg
- Re: [SLUG] Should Linux companies be using Linux exc... Dean Hamstead
- Re: [SLUG] Should Linux companies be using Linux exc... Mehmet Ozdemir
- Re: [SLUG] Should Linux companies be using Linux... Rodos
- Re: [SLUG] Should Linux companies be using Linux... Rev Simon Rumble
- Re: [SLUG] Should Linux companies be using Linux... Dean Hamstead
- [SLUG] Computers for disabled kevin
- Re: [SLUG] Computers for disabled Darrell Burkey
- Re: [SLUG] Computers for disabled Terry Collins
- Re: [SLUG] Should Linux companies be using Linux exc... Steve Kowalik
- RE: [SLUG] Should Linux companies be using Linux exc... Jill Rowling
