On Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 08:06:37AM +1000, Jeffrey Borg wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 28 Jul 2000, Richard Ames wrote:
>
> > Ken was right on target.... RedHat suggests LPRng and apparently have it in
> > Rawhide. See: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14691
>
> Don't rip the binary rpm out of rawhide btw!
>
> because it's based on glibc 2.2 and won't work with glibc 2.1, Get the
> source rpm for it and recompile it, That should work for you.
Is this true? I thought incompatibilities at the libc level were supposed
to warrant a major number increase.
at I understand it the incompatiblities between 2.0, 2.1 and 2.2 are not
at an interface level but in different implementations and other programs
(unreasonable) expectations of specific side-effects.
Anand
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
