you have many more options with squid , and can use it to to other things
for you eg , dial the net if down ..
you can also resize you storage size with out loosing items as well.
I find it's quicker the apache , but this might not be true .
chris
----- Original Message -----
From: John Wiltshire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2000 1:22 PM
Subject: [SLUG] Apache vs Squid
> A quick question:
>
> What is the best for a web proxy on a home machine acting as a NAT box -
> Apache or Squid? I currently have apache set up (because it was easy),
but
> I'm wondering if I would be better off using Squid.
>
> John Wiltshire
>
>
> --
> SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
> More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
>
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
