>I think you could reasonable argue that the above clause does not cover NAT.
>Note that no computer behind the NAT box is actually 'connected' to the
>service - rather the NAT machine is relaying requests of the machines not
>connected.

Ah... That argument is so thin it's anorexic...:-)



--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug

Reply via email to