On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 11:39:10PM +1000, Roland Turner wrote: > the original 1.0 release of Debian <trivia class=random> there was no 1.0 release of debian. some magazine got hold of a fairly broken pre-release and gave it out labelled as "debian 1.0". thus the real debian release had to be labelled "1.1" </trivia> -- - Gus -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
- [SLUG] debian 2.2 (potato) released Angus Lees
- Re: [SLUG] debian 2.2 (potato) released Jeff Waugh
- Re: [SLUG] debian 2.2 (potato) released Dan Treacy
- Re: [SLUG] debian 2.2 (potato) released marty
- Re: [SLUG] debian 2.2 (potato) released Jeff Waugh
- Re: [SLUG] debian 2.2 (potato) released DaZZa
- Re: [SLUG] debian 2.2 (potato) released Heracles
- Re: [SLUG] debian 2.2 (potato) release... Roland Turner
- Re: [SLUG] debian 2.2 (potato) rel... Terry Collins
- Re: [SLUG] debian 2.2 (potato)... Dan Treacy
- Re: [SLUG] debian 2.2 (potato) rel... Angus Lees
- Re: [SLUG] debian 2.2 (potato) released Terry Collins
- Re: [SLUG] debian 2.2 (potato) released Jeff Waugh
- Re: [SLUG] debian 2.2 (potato) released Dan Treacy
- Re: [Festies] Re: [SLUG] debian 2.2 (p... Jeff Waugh
- Re: [SLUG] debian 2.2 (potato) released jon
- Re: [SLUG] debian 2.2 (potato) released Michael Fox
