On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 11:36:58AM +1000, John Wiltshire wrote: > From: marty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > >> A very bad user interface replacing a good one. > > > >not to mention stability issues... > > > >http://www8.50megs.com/thepix/photos/special-pres/image27.htm > > Not wanting to be too critical, but that screen is a Win9x BSOD and not NT. > Be careful that you don't get too zealous in your advocacy or you'll end up > ruining the whole argument. I saw a few displaying DHCP error dialogs on the weekend (definitly NT) didn't have my camera with me unfortunatly... -- enterfornone - insert clever comment here http://www.enterfornone.com/ -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
- Re: [SLUG] OT NT on train timet... James Wilkinson
- Re: [SLUG] OT NT on train timet... DaZZa
- Re: [SLUG] OT NT on train timet... Michael Lake
- Re: [SLUG] OT NT on train timet... Jeff Waugh
- Re: [SLUG] OT NT on train timet... chesty
- Re: [SLUG] OT NT on train timet... Jason Rennie
- Re: [SLUG] OT NT on train timetable screens vs indic... Jon Biddell
- Re: [SLUG] OT NT on train timetable screens vs indic... Ben Leslie
- Re: [SLUG] OT NT on train timetable screens vs i... Paul Robinson
- RE: [SLUG] OT NT on train timetable screens vs indicator ... enterfornone
- RE: [SLUG] OT NT on train timetable screens vs indicator ... John Wiltshire
- RE: [SLUG] OT NT on train timetable screens vs indicator ... Patrick Kelso
- Re: [SLUG] OT NT on train timetable screens vs indicator ... Stuart Cooper
- Re: [SLUG] OT NT on train timetable screens vs indic... Rev Simon Rumble
- RE: [SLUG] OT NT on train timetable screens vs indicator ... John Wiltshire
- Re: [SLUG] OT NT on train timetable screens vs indicator ... Michael Fox
- RE: [SLUG] OT NT on train timetable screens vs indicator ... bez
