On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 01:14:37PM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 01:43:40PM +1100, Angus Lees wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 10:53:11AM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > I'm running an old soundblaster card that fits into the ISA (?) bus,
> > > and so had to compile the modules to make it work - the default sound
> > > and sb modules did not work.
> > 
> > ? the modules should work.. you specified io, irq, dma, etc ?
> 
> symbols not present ... the next paragraph sorta implied that. Mostly
> midi symbols, sound symbols ... nothing to do with setttings.

did you insmod all the other required modules first?
(like midi, soundcore, etc - have a look at a modules.dep)

> > the actual deb config used to build the kernel-image.debs is
> > kernel-source-2.xx/.config.save
> > 
> > just cp that to .config, and then rerun make-kpkg (you are using
> > kernel-package aren't you?)
> 
> er ... no, make xconfig 

use make xconfig to config the kernel, but use make-kpkg (from
kernel-package) to actually do the build.

having all your /boot/System.map's etc kept up to date, and having all
modules, etc properly removed is well worth it.

> Problem is, there's a vmlinuz-2.2.17-idepci in the base directory on
> disk 1, but no corresponding source in devel - there's only 
> kernel-source-2.2.17_2.2.17pre6-1.deb, corresponding to a "plain"
> 2.2.17.
> 
> This confused me at first. It could be on the other disks, but that
> would surprise me.

using "apt-get source kernel-image-2.2.17-idepci" you would have found
a few scripts that use the source from a "kernel-source-2.2.17"
package to build the right kernel image.

the only really releveant file being debian/config which is the config
used for the kernel. as said earlier, this is the same as that
installed into /boot/config-2.2.17*, by the binary package.

-- 
 - Gus


--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug

Reply via email to