On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, chesty generated: >On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 10:12:12AM +0100, Jim Hague wrote: >> Today's food for thought. You have obtained the entire source for, say, W2k and >> O2k. What do you do with it? > >Fix some bugs and send patch back to MS? maybe not :) Actually, I'd prolly browse some of it when really really bored, looking for programming errors (and finding many)... "they use _what_ for a character input??... and this buffer has a hardcoded size?" The number of exploits that could be found for W2K given the source. A crax0rs dream. -- Sure, I subscribe to USENET, but I only get it for the articles. -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
- [SLUG] MS goes Open Source - sort of Jim Hague
- Re: [SLUG] MS goes Open Source - sort of Thom May
- Re: [SLUG] MS goes Open Source - sort of Rick Welykochy
- Re: [SLUG] MS goes Open Source - sort of DaZZa
- Re: [SLUG] MS goes Open Source - sort of chesty
- Re: [SLUG] MS goes Open Source - sort of James Wilkinson
- Re: [SLUG] MS goes Open Source - sort of jon
- Re: [SLUG] MS goes Open Source - sort of jon
- Re: [SLUG] MS goes Open Source - sort of Andrew Macks
- Re: [SLUG] MS goes Open Source - sort of donohueb
- Re: [SLUG] MS goes Open Source - sort of Jeff Waugh
- Re: [SLUG] MS goes Open Source - sort of Dean Hamstead
- Re: [SLUG] MS goes Open Source - sort of Jeff Waugh
- Re: [SLUG] MS goes Open Source - sort of Dean Hamstead
- Re: [SLUG] MS goes Open Source - sor... Jeff Waugh
- Re: [SLUG] MS goes Open Source - sor... Ken Caldwell
