On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 11:18:51AM +1000, John Wiltshire wrote: > > Realistically I'm not so sure that this hack has any real > positive benefit of OSS other than embarassing M$ and giving the media > something to go nuts about for a while. "EXTRA! EXTRA! MS products possibly subject to peer review" I like Need To Know's take on this issue (http://www.ntk.net/): Traditionally, Microsoft has blamed security breaches via trojans, not on the gaping holes in MS software, but to poor discipline at the victim's companies. Companies must educate "not to run a program from an origin you don't trust", said a MS rep last time we all got hit. So, does this include Microsoft itself now? Conrad. -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
- Re: [SLUG] MS goes Open Source - sort of Jeff Waugh
- Re: [SLUG] MS goes Open Source - sort of Ken Caldwell
- Re: [SLUG] MS goes Open Source - sor... Patrick Mougin
- Re: [SLUG] MS goes Open Source - sort of Steve Kowalik
- Re: [SLUG] MS goes Open Source - sort of James Wilkinson
- Re: [SLUG] MS goes Open Source - sort of Conrad Parker
- Re: [SLUG] MS goes Open Source - sort of James Wilkinson
- Re: [SLUG] MS goes Open Source - sort of John Clarke
- Re: [SLUG] MS goes Open Source - sort of James Wilkinson
- RE: [SLUG] MS goes Open Source - sort of John Wiltshire
- Re: [SLUG] MS goes Open Source - sort of Conrad Parker
- Re: [SLUG] MS goes Open Source - sort of James Wilkinson
- RE: [SLUG] MS goes Open Source - sort of John Wiltshire
- RE: [SLUG] MS goes Open Source - sort of John Wiltshire
- Re: [SLUG] MS goes Open Source - sort of John Ferlito
- Re: [SLUG] MS goes Open Source - sort of Raoul Golan
- Re: [SLUG] MS goes Open Source - sort of Stuart Cooper
- RE: [SLUG] MS goes Open Source - sort of John Wiltshire
- RE: [SLUG] MS goes Open Source - sort of Jamie Honan
