> Jason's point about wanting rpm prompted this thought.
>
> Surely the point is not so much that one distro is rpm or
> deb based.
>
> If you get an rpm for RH, this does not neccessarily mean the
> dependancies or file layout will make sense for say SuSE.
>
> Has anyone struck this much?
In theory at leaast the FHS (thats the right name isn't it) should prevent
this. Most of the distro's are supposedly supporting it.
Jason
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
