On 19 Feb, Rev Simon Rumble scribbled:
->  On Sun, Feb 18, 2001 at 04:53:33PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
->  
->  > they COULD - but that would be breaking the developmnet line and just
->  > cause problems because people now have 2 different competing versions
->  > of software and dont know which one to use etc. etc. etc.
->  
->  Okay so these stupid customers don't care what they're running.  So
->  where's the problem?  I really don't see anything that would hold back
->  Linux in the commercial realm.  Most new features are "nice" things,
->  not mission critical.

oh.. the do care.. they just dont understand and get confused easily.
trust me :)

->  IMHO the only customers who can demand, and get, definite release
->  dates from software companies are the REALLY big computing customers.

thats not reality tho :)

->  I'm not talking Fortune 500 companies worried about their desktops but
->  people like Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley with massive amounts of
->  money invested in their hardware and big relationships with their
->  suppliers.  These are the only people for whom this would ever be a
->  problem as they need to squeeze out the last ounce of performance.
->  
->  They're also intelligent enought to understand the dynamics of the
->  development process themselves.  If they chose to go with Linux, it
->  wouldn't be a poorly thought out decision.
->  

-- 
--------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------------
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)    [EMAIL PROTECTED]     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                                    [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                                    [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug

Reply via email to