> Like most "unbreakable" golden rules in programming, there are many > cases when one should break it. The problem is that everyone has a > different idea on what those cases are. Blood has been spilled in > various attempts to come to an agreement. :) > > Multiple exit points on error conditions is probably ok, but I'm > not willing to risk life or limb to defend that assertion. I guess i'm a sloppy programmer then, i stick exit()'s in code when I have some nasty fail error, sinply becasue it is easy to see where it was up to, and the exits live with the broken peice of code :) Jason -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
- [SLUG] That somewhat theoretical problem. Bill Bennett
- Re: [SLUG] That somewhat theoretical problem. Terry Collins
- Re: [SLUG] That somewhat theoretical problem. Steve Kowalik
- Re: [SLUG] That somewhat theoretical problem. Jason Rennie
- Re: [SLUG] That somewhat theoretical problem. Raoul Golan
- Re: [SLUG] That somewhat theoretical problem. Jason Rennie
- Re: [SLUG] That somewhat theoretical prob... Peter Faulks
- Re: [SLUG] That somewhat theoretical problem. Jon Biddell
- Re: [SLUG] That somewhat theoretical problem. James Wilkinson
- Re: [SLUG] That somewhat theoretical problem. Ken Yap
- Re: [SLUG] That somewhat theoretical problem. Andrew Bennetts
- RE: [SLUG] That somewhat theoretical problem. Jill Rowling
- RE: [SLUG] That somewhat theoretical problem. Jill Rowling
- RE: [SLUG] That somewhat theoretical problem. Rick Welykochy
- Re: [SLUG] That somewhat theoretical problem. Tom Nott
