OK, next question. What's the RTFM for this? -- Howard. ____________________________________________________ LANNet Computing Associates <http://lannetlinux.com> "...well, it worked before _you_ touched it!" --me "I trust just one person, and there are times when I don't even trust myself" --me On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Umar Goldeli wrote: > Again, you're assuming that they *initially* get root access. If you're in > as user "squid" chrooted to /cache with only access to /cache/cache1 and > /cache/cache2 which are mounted noexec and nosuid, what next? -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
- Re: [SLUG] Firewall security audi... Howard Lowndes
- Re: [SLUG] Firewall security audi... Crossfire
- Re: [SLUG] Firewall security audi... Umar Goldeli
- Re: [SLUG] Firewall security audi... Crossfire
- Re: [SLUG] Firewall security audi... Umar Goldeli
- Re: [SLUG] Firewall security audit report Umar Goldeli
- Re: [SLUG] Firewall security audit re... Howard Lowndes
- Re: [SLUG] Firewall security audi... Umar Goldeli
- Re: [SLUG] Firewall security audit re... chesty
- Re: [SLUG] Firewall security audit report - advice. :) Umar Goldeli
- Re: [SLUG] Firewall security audit report - advice... Howard Lowndes
- Re: [SLUG] Firewall security audit report - ad... Umar Goldeli
- Re: [SLUG] Firewall security audit report Scott Howard
- Re: [SLUG] Firewall security audit report Umar Goldeli
- Re: [SLUG] Firewall security audit report Howard Lowndes
- Re: [SLUG] Firewall security audit report Umar Goldeli
- Re: [SLUG] Firewall security audit report Ian Tester
- Re: [SLUG] Firewall security audit report Dave Fitch
- Re: [SLUG] Firewall security audit report Howard Lowndes
- Re: [SLUG] Firewall security audit report Conrad Parker
- Re: [SLUG] Firewall security audit report Howard Lowndes
