On 25-Apr-01 Terry Collins wrote:
> Okay, I'm lost on this.
> 
> I've done a new installation of RH7.0 (2.2.16-22) and it did nothing
> about the networking (local cdrom installation). So now I want to add it
> in. As I understand it, all I needed to do is insmod ne.o, but there are
> unresolved symbols (Does this mean a complete kernel rebuild?).

try

        modprobe ne

as opposed to insmod. The difference is that mopdprobe will look at modules.dep
and auto-install the dependent modules (insmod won't).

> (I get a delayed initialisation on eth0 on startup).
> 
> 
> My thinking is that all I need to do is rebuild the modules dependancy
> stuff, but this is where I'm getting nowhere fast.

man depmod - depmod is normally run as part of boot initialization, usually
someplace in your rc.sysinit script.

> The LDP talks about rebuilding the kernel itself and ignores the
> modules, plus I can not find a clear list of the steps. The Modules mini
> is old, very old, like Redhat 4.1.
> 
> at this stage, I'm thinking all I need to do is
> make modules,
> then make modules-install
> and I'm away.

if you installed the kernel rpm (which you almost certainly have), then you
should see a module tree under /lib/modules/<version #>

there should be NO necessity to recompile a RH kernel. whatever you seek is
either:

      - in the kernel (unlikely, as the kernel is heavily modulized)
      - module available (you might need to update modules.conf though)
      - unsupported.
 
as for setting up your network, you might try running netconf (which will make
the necessary /etc/modules.conf entry), and then you just use network start/stop
to start the network manually (or reboot to start it at boot time).

regards,

-Greg

+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
"DOS Computers manufactured by companies such as IBM, Compaq, Tandy, and
millions of others are by far the most popular, with about 70 million
machines in use wordwide. Macintosh fans, on the other hand, may note that
cockroaches are far more numerous than humans, and that numbers alone do
not denote a higher life form."       (New York Times, November 26, 1991)
| Greg Hosler                           i-net:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]    |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug

Reply via email to