On Thu, 24 May 2001, Andrew Reilly wrote:
> There are two equally valid answers, and they have existed for a
> _very_ long time. These are:
>
> 1) Unix (with vi or some other editor)
You mean working at the shell level?
Is it possible to integrate vi with compilation & debugging?
e.g.
- click on compiler error message to jump to that line in editor
- single-stepping though source in the editor.
> Some people try to
> use emacs as the editor for 1), but that doesn't work as well as
> (2), because it loses some of the multi-buffer bennefits of
> emacs, and because emacs tends to be fairly slow to start up.
In ye olde terminal days, emacs would just suspend (^Z) when not in use.
--
Mike Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--==--
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
