<quote who="Andre Pang">
> personally, i'd think that reiserfs is far more stable than XFS, only
> because it's got a lot more testing in the field, and scary numbers of
> people (sourceforge, mp3.com) are using it on disk arrays over 1000GB in
> size.
Compared to XFS, which has "only" been in wide use since 1994?
I think not, weenie monkey! ;) </oedebattle>
XFS is certainly new to Linux, but it's a very stable filesystem that has
been in use for yonkles. A lot of the mess has already been sorted out...
Unfortunately, XFS doesn't have a celebrity PITA representative. ;)
- Jeff
--
"The ability to procrastinate is what separates us from the machines."
- Chris Gregory, Desktop Magazine
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
