That is exactly the point. The potential recipient MUST NOT be
pre-advised. The first they must know about the possibility of an award
is an approach by the GG's Secretary asking if they would be prepared to
accept an award. It is a requirement of the scheme.
--
Howard. LANNet Computing Associates <http://lannetlinux.com>
_____________________________________________________________
"We needn't, as socialists, get too concerned about privacy;
it's a bourgeois right, closely allied to the right to private property".
- Former Federal Health Minister Neal Blewett,
addressing the Fabian Society in 1988 in relation to the Australia Card issue.
On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, John Ferlito wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 01:29:29PM +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> > <quote who="Jeff Waugh">
> >
> > > [ This will be an interesting thing to tell Tridge when he comes to next
> > > month's SLUG meeting (almost confirmed). ]
> >
> > Shut up, Jeff:
> >
> > "The person being nominated should not be approached for information or
> > advised of his or her nomination at any stage."
>
> Hmm that could be interesting. How does one discuss nominations
> on public mailing lists and meetings without the nominee finding out :)
>
>
>
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
