On Mon 11 Mar, [EMAIL PROTECTED] bloviated thus:

> Eh?  I use it all the time.  Unless you mean, "use groff instead"?  I
> have to agree, that I think nowadays the groff version of troff is
> better than the original, as of about last year.

No, don't use troff or groff.  There are _FAR_ better ways to lay out
a document that don't have you learning incredibly obscure commands
and syntax.  Troff has had its day.

> it's almost fast enough to do interactively.

My point precisely.  Use something that _IS_ interactive, or at least
something that is a bit easier to learn.

-- 
Rev Simon Rumble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www.rumble.net

Diplomacy is the art of saying "nice doggy" until
you can find a rock.
- Will Rogers
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug

Reply via email to