On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 01:35:28PM +1000, Simon Wong wrote:
> Sluggers,
> 
> I notice that gcc-3.1 has slipped into the debian archives...
> 
> What are people's opinion of this new version?
> 
> My "understanding" is that it is not really stable yet and shouldn't be
> used.  Is this true?

I bloody well hope not, it's going to be the default very, very soon. :)

When 3.0.x was released, the only architectures it was recommended for
use on were hppa, ia64, etc; the new architectures that didn't support
gcc 2.95.x.

With 3.1.x, however, gcc has apparently stabilized, and should be All
Good. The latest KDE should build fine on it, HOWEVER you will also have
to recompile libqt et al.

This is because of massive differences in the C++ linkage etc, which
means that for C++ stuff, it's all or nothing wrt gcc 3.1.x. It's also a
lot more strict, so it won't tolerate slightly dodgy code that somehow
worked on 2.95.x.

G'luck!
:) d

-- 
Daniel Stone       <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   http://raging.dropbear.id.au
KDE Developer      <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>                           http://www.kde.org
Kopete: Multi-protocol IM client            http://www.kdedevelopers.net/kopete/

Attachment: msg23830/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to