<quote who="Matthew Davidson">
> - Looks and feels somewhat like Windows explorer
> - Does not have a ridiculous number of dependencies (which rules out
> anything built for GNOME or KDE)
(Why do people still have issues with sensible delineation of libraries?)
> - Will run on a Pentium with 32Mb RAM (ditto)
Now *that* makes sense.
> and preferably:
>
> - will mount/unmount removable media with a click or two
> - comes packaged as a .deb for Woody
Dunno about these, but xftree (from XFCE) and ROX may do the trick. You
might find the GTK+ 2 based ones to be speedier than their 1.x counterparts
too, btw. :-)
- Jeff
--
"But in the software world, that's daily business." - Kent Beck
"That's pissing money away and leaving scar tissue." - Alan Cooper
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug