On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 10:04:47AM +1000 or thereabouts, Ian Su wrote: > 'stable' is called stable because it contains much older packages. If you > were using unstable before, you will probably have all the latest packages > already, and therefore, nothing to upgrade to in stable.
... as I discovered (:-) Adam. > > On Mon, 23 Sep 2002 14:14, Adam Bogacki wrote: > > > If you are on unstable then just wait 24 hours and see if the problem > > > resolves, easier to wait than clean up an unholy mess. > > > > > > KenF > > > > I've changed 'unstable' to 'stable' in /etc/apt/sources.list > > and on 'upgrade' it said '0 pkgs to upgrade' > > - is it a problem mixing stable and unstable pkgs ? > > > > AdamB > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > Regards, > Ian Su > SIRCA (Securities Industry Research Centre of Asia-Pacific) > Tel: 8374-5078 Email: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
