On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 07:14:16AM +1000, Mary wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2002, Steve Lindsay wrote:
> > A question for debian-ites. Is there much value in tracking debian
> > testing?
> > 
> > I was thinking that it might be a nice way to stay relatively up to
> > date with new software (compared to stable), not _too_ risky in terms
> > of stability (compared to unstable), and not too hard on the dialup
> > connection (compared to unstable).
> 
> I started running unstable after testing froze for woody. But I quite
> liked tracking testing, unstable has been known to break things like
> ssh, lilo and apache (well, it is "unstable") which was annoying even on
> my absolutely non-critical desktop.
> 
> > Based on such impeccable reasoning I updated my sources.list to point
> > at testing and the updates were 178mb! (on my connection this is a
> > loooong download) I understand that it has been a while since woody
> > was released so there will have been plenty of updates to catch up
> > with but are changes to testing usually added at such a rate that I'm
> > going to be up for big updates like this on a regular basis? My modem
> > is still sore.
> 
> Packages go into testing once they've been in unstable for a little
> while (a week or so?) and no critical bugs have been reported. So it
> depends how often you update. The packages will change a little less
> often than unstable, but will change fairly frequently. Update once a
> month, and it will be well over 100MB each time. Update more often, and
> it will only be 5-10MB as Erik said.

the frequency depends on the urgency of the update, but generally speaking,
it is around a week, 10 days.

I personally runs testing on most of my boxes, without any problems. Once
in a while some issues happens (recently, the merge of some core packages
into coreutils made the upgrade non smooth, but it is not really a common
thing). 

Some people are working on diffs download (rsync) trough apt instead of the full
packages, which should help a lot when connected trough low speed lines.

JeF
> 
> -Mary
> -- 
> SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
> More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug

-- 

-> Jean-Francois Dive
--> [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  There is no such thing as randomness.  Only order of infinite
  complexity.  - _The Holographic Universe_, Michael Talbot

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug

Reply via email to