On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 08:07:00PM +1100, Stephen Robert Norris wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-11-03 at 19:07, Kieran Haughey wrote:
> e2fsck -c should mark any bad blocks as not to be used, and repair the
> filesystem (as much as is possible) around them.

Well for some reason the sectors in question don't get marked as bad blocks and every 
time I run e2fsck it always hits them.  They basically fail to read the sector 4-5 
times and then move on, usually the failures occur around the same point of the disk 
(geometrically speaking).  I will try to give these another run over though.

> You can use dump | restore with appropriate arguments - that's what I
> meant, only I didn't actually remember to say it. That eliminates the
> need for any temporary files. I prefer it over tar because it gets
> permissions, devices, sparse files, etc. etc. right by default, I always
> miss an option with tar :)

Graeme provided me a link to a HOWTO to do this between different disk sizes which I 
intend reading through first, but I'll keep the dump/restore in mind :-).

Thanks,
Kieran
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug

Reply via email to