Terry Collins wrote: > > Does it? I've been tossing whether to go analog or > > webalizer. Is webalizer the clear winner? > > This is analog output for ou to compare. > http://www.woa.com.au/weblog/results.2002.html
Listing directories with at least 0.01% of the traffic, sorted by the amount of traffic. reqs: %bytes: directory ----: ------: --------- 5330: 31.73%: /ba/ 2075: 25.80%: /ba/routes/ 751: 1.54%: /ba/links/ 317: 0.42%: /ba/faq/ 2745: 17.38%: /woacs/ 1867: 16.65%: /woacs/hardware/ 280: 0.32%: /woacs/courses/ 100: 0.06%: /woacs/products/ 5155: 12.90%: /terryc/ I particularly like the heirarchical breakdown of the sites. Thats useful. I see that terrys site has a few sites that are the tops ones having a high percentage of visitation. Very different to my www.caves.org.au that has a 'flat, spiky' distribution. Mike -- Mike Lake Uni of Technol., Sydney UTS CRICOS Provider Code: 00099F DISCLAIMER ======================================================================== This email message and any accompanying attachments may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, use, disseminate, distribute or copy this message or attachments. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this message. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender expressly, and with authority, states them to be the views the University of Technology Sydney. Before opening any attachments, please check them for viruses and defects. ======================================================================== -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
