I don't think it's off topic either.. i've been following closely
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, David Fitch wrote: > On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 01:26:47PM +1100, Tony Green wrote: > > On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 13:21, David Fitch wrote: > > > you could argue that it's not a "legimate mail server" > > > if it doesn't reverse resolve. > > > Are there valid reasons why they wouldn't reverse resolve? > > > > What if you house your machines at a co-lo site? You're allocated an IP > > and you can't control the reverse mapping of it. Does that mean that > > you don't have a 'legimate mail server'? > > you might not be able to control the reverse mapping but it > should still map to something - which is good enough. > Are there co-lo places where the IP doesn't reverse map to > anything? and if so, why? (apart from incompetence > or cluelessness) > > > We're getting off-topic and should take this to -chat > > I'm not on slug-chat, and besides I don't think it's OT. > > Dave. > -- > SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ > More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug > -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
