On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, Alex Sayle wrote:

> On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, Ben Leslie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote...
> 
>  > On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, Alex Sayle wrote:
>  > 
>  > > On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Matthew Hyne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote...
>  > > 
>  > >  > 
>  > >  > Folks,
>  > >  > 
>  > >  > I am looking for a non-X unix editor that also does syntax hilighting.
>  > >  > 
>  > >  > I know I could use emacs, however I would prefer something like pico -
>  > >  > but with code hilighting (and if it does PHP - even better.
>  > >  > 
>  > >  > Does anyone know of such an app ?
>  > >  > 
>  > >  > Matt
>  > >  
>  > >  nano[1], the simple and easy to use editor now has syntax hi-lighting. 
>  > >  it's not the most high-tech terminal editor around but its simple and
>  > >  there's no need to sacrifice any sheep before using in (unlike emacs or
>  > >  vi which you need to be on asid before you understand how to use it). 
>  > 
>  > I thought the point of nano was that it was *small* (hence the name). Why
>  > do they have to go and ruin it with crap like syntax hi-lighting! <sigh>
> 
> 
> humm.. let me see...
> 
>       3.8M    /usr/bin/emacs (emacs21.2)
>       1.1M    /usr/bin/vim    
>       308k    /usr/bin/nvi
>       199k    /usr/bin/pico
>       95K     /usr/bin/nano
> 
> I mean, sure, it not as good as 
>       42k     /bin/ed 
> 
> which is a *real* editor.

ae, my fave tiny editor, is only 23k and is much easier to use than ed :).
 
> I find it handy for things likes editors for my e-mails or editing 
> small conf files, as I don't like the wait for emacs to load in order 
> to edit one line and I couldn't be ass-ed remembering vi commands.
> (not to mention the sacrificial sheep ritual) 
> So an editor that is simple does the job and high lights my conf files 
> is handy.

I agree, I just don't need syntax hilighting or multiple buffers in 
those cases. :)

Getting the latest nano, from above website the difference between
and compiling with --enable-all results in an 87k binary. With --enable-tiny
you get a 43k binary. (Stripped binaries of course).

I guess doubling the size for hilighting isn't too bad :)

Benno
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug

Reply via email to