This one time, at band camp, Luke Burton wrote: >On Monday, June 2, 2003, at 09:16 AM, Jon Biddell wrote: > >> 3. There must be NO DISCERNABLE INTERRUPTION TO SERVICE when one >> fails. Doing a "shift-reload" in the browser is NOT an option. It >> must be TOTALLY TRANSPARENT.
>A good compromise might be to have a 'forwarder' machine hosted on a >highly available, redundant network of your choosing. You make sure >that the logic in this thing is as simple as possible, so that there is >a minimised risk of it going wrong. You pay a few $$ to make sure that >it's on failover hardware, redundant net connections, etc. Just a thought, maybe just an old Pentium box that does port forwarding. - Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
