This is what i have installe on my system, but how do you force the system to use 2.95 say when doing a make-kpkg.
I usually have to go on and change the /usr/bin/gcc symlink to point to the one I want at the time, which is why I ended up with a kernel with 3.2, forgot to change it one time Alex On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 10:09:10AM +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > On Tue, 3 Jun 2003 09:54:49 +1000 > Alexander Samad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > What is the right version of gcc to compile the kernel with. > > > > I have debian testing installed and have noticed the moved towards > > gcc-3.3 but the doc for the kernel still mention 2.95. > > Thats correct. > > > I have successfuly built the kernel with 3.2 (by accident!) > > > > What are other people using for their kernel 3.3 3.2 2.95 ??? > > I believe that it is possible to build a kernel with later compilers, > but if anything goes wrong and you want to mail the linux kernel > development list, they will not be willing to help unless you are > compiling with 2.95.X > > At least with Debian its relatively easy to keep more than one compiler > on a machine. I currently have 2.95, 3.0 and 3.2. I should probably get > rid of 3.0. In fact I'm going to do that right now :-) > > Erik > -- > +-----------------------------------------------------------+ > Erik de Castro Lopo [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Yes it's valid) > +-----------------------------------------------------------+ > "The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is probably the > day they start making vacuum cleaners." -- Ernst Jan Plugge > -- > SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ > More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
