From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 18-06-2003 10:57:32 AM: > > > On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 10:18:29AM +1000, Oscar Plameras wrote: > > --snip-- > > > > But not an informed choice. For all we know it could be something > > obscure. Links without comment will have one of four effects on people: > > > > 1) Click on the link, register, XYZ is good. (+1 oscar rules) > > 2) Why is this Oscar guy posting links without commenrts ? (delete, > > +2 ignore oscar posts) > > 3) Click on the link, register, don't care about XYZ (+ 10 ignore > > oscar posts and/or flame) > > 4) See that the link is nytimes, don't bother but find out later > > that it would have been nice to know earlier (+1 oscar sux) > > > > No Flames, but I would give oscar +10 ignore on the scale above as it is > posted on /. (www.slashdot.org) with no registration needed. > If went through the pain of registering with NYTimes and subsequently get > their monthly newsletters (Or whatever crap is sent weekly/monthly to > subscribers), because of a subject I am already educated on, I would be very unhappy. > > No Offence Oscar. > No, I don't. Thank you. -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
