On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Mary Gardiner wrote: > Second, there remains a vast difference between stating that you did not > receive a reply to your email, and stating that SLUG "did not bother to > respond". The final paragraph of your article is a misrepresentation of > what took place, and unfairly portrays SLUG as having ignored an inquiry > that, in fact, the SLUG committee did not receive.
Which is exactly the same complaint that I have this Sam's behaviour towards CLUG. Especially given Tridge's extreme efforts towards contactability. Mark, is there any progress on this issue? Mikal -- Michael Still ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) | Stage 1: Steal underpants http://www.stillhq.com | Stage 2: ???? UTC + 10 | Stage 3: Profit -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
