Why is that this list doesn't have the 'Reply-To:' header field set? It
would make life much easier, it's a pain in the arse to reply to reply
to a list without cc'ing the original sender. Is there a reason for
this? am I missing something?

rgh

-- 
"It is possible to make things of great complexity out of things
 that are very simple. There is no conservation of simplicity"
 -- Stephen Wolfram

Richard Heycock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
tel : 0410 646 369
key fingerprint : 909D CBFA C669 AC2F A937 AFA4 661B 9D21 EAAB 4291
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug

Reply via email to