Hi all, Just reading over Johns png images of >>>http://members.microsoft.com/partner/training/learningcenter/default.aspx .... > you may access the content of these two "Linux Courses" at > www.jon.fl.net.au/linux/linux_1.tar.gz and > www.jon.fl.net.au/linux/linux_2.tar.gz
I read... - "Linux has had more vulnerabilities during 2002 than all versions of Microsoft OSs combined" - "Linux and Solaris have significantly more CERT advisories in 2002 than all Microsoft software combined" There are no specific references to backup these statements - just general refs at the end of the section. Whats the real situation? Certainly I saw that SP$ for Win 2000 that I have at work has hundreds of security pathches listed for that so how are they juggling figures to come out with statements like that? -- Mike Lake Caver, Linux enthusiast and interested in anything technical. UTS CRICOS Provider Code: 00099F DISCLAIMER ======================================================================== This email message and any accompanying attachments may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, use, disseminate, distribute or copy this message or attachments. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this message. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender expressly, and with authority, states them to be the views the University of Technology Sydney. Before opening any attachments, please check them for viruses and defects. ======================================================================== -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
