I don't think it was ls. I think digging further it is actually a limitation of smbfs. Looks like it won't get fixed until 2.5 either :(
dave ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rowling, Jill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > The ls command may be getting confused with the large file, but dir is just > doing what SAMBA is telling it. > 4GB is trivial for an exchange database, BTW. They can grow into the > hundreds of GB if you let them. > Is your version of 'ls' compiled with largefile support? (file > 2GB) -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
