<quote who="DE LUCA Ben">

> > If you need to handle more load, throw another cpu, more ram or another
> > box at the problem.
> 
> Some times this is not possible, that even a 0.1% increase in performance
> is worth it. 

If you're talking about film, audio or image processing, 3d rendering, or
anything that has a high applicability of line-by-line intensive maths/loop
optimisations, then sure, you may find some advantage here, if your volume
is large enough that 0.1% would have a reasonable effect. This would be
appropriate at a rendering farm at Dreamworks, or a content creator's 3d
imaging preview software, rather than Mum's MP3 encoder.

If you're talking about number crunching stock market data, doing massive
biotech database mangling, running a huge Internet indexing and spidering
system, or mapping the moon, you can make algorithmic or architectural
changes to your code - potentially using 'grid' or distributed processing,
or whatever the latest craze is. This is big stuff that humans do, not
compilers.

If you're talking about a mail server, you can change a DNS record and add a
machine to the pool. And indeed, this was the original poster's problem
area.

Don't believe the hype.

- Jeff

-- 
Get Informed: SCO vs. IBM                            http://sco.iwethey.org/
 
    "Think video. Think text flickering over your walls. Think games at
    work. Think anything where a staid, link-based browser is useless."
          "This person wrote for Ab Fab, right?" - Rich Welykochy
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug

Reply via email to