<quote who="Grant Parnell"> > On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, Jamie Wilkinson wrote: > > > This one time, at band camp, Grant Parnell wrote: > > >This way people can adjust their own tolerance levels in their own > > >filters quite trivially. > > > > The slug lists do this already, for spamassassin. People have been free > > to use it since the dawn of time (well, for the spamassassin epoch dawn, > > that is) > > Well correct me if I'm wrong but I can't see any evidence of Spamassassin > in this header...
We have spamassassin scanning at the mailman level; it doesn't add SA headers to the mail however. That should be handled at the client end - anyone who can handle filtering based on SA headers should be able to run SpamAssassin themselves, and have far more control over what happens. The other suggestion, TMDA, is not something that I would recommend to anyone who likes to receive email. :-) - Jeff -- linux.conf.au 2004: Adelaide, Australia http://lca2004.linux.org.au/ "It doesn't matter if it is good, it only matters if it rocks." - Tenacious D, Rock Your Socks -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
