Dear Ken, We note that ESR qualifies this statement based on Hattons defect-density Study and states:
`Beware of taking these numbers too literally however' kind regards, Norman On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Ken Foskey wrote: > > I have always been taught to code smaller and smaller modules in my > coding. Now it appears that I have been wrong. > > http://catb.org/~esr/writings/taoup/html/ch04s01.html > > The sweet spot for module size is about 200 lines. I guess this is > because you get into a "maze of twisty subroutines all different" > (Anyone remember adventure?) > > What module size do you set for yourself? > > > -- > Thanks > KenF -- E-Solutions for BSD and Linux http://www.paladincorp.com.au/ -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
