On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 11:44, Mary Gardiner wrote: > On Wed, Jan 28, 2004, Peter Hardy wrote: > > The real problem is the warning replies from assorted anti virus > > products. They balance out the stupidity of replying in the first place > > by very sensibly stripping the virusy payload. > > Any way to catch some kind of "you have a virus" regexp in the body? > That's kind of nasty, it'll force all virus discussions into moderation > :(
Something like that, and the from checks that started this thread, would probably be best dealt with as SpamAssassin tests, IMO. As for why it hasn't been done for SLUG yet, I plead paid employment. :-) -- Pete -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
