Plus MS has a license from SCO and does not release source code. So even if
it does contain direct code its ok.



> From: Jeff Waugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 21:04:08 +1100
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SLUG] copyright breaches - multi user platforms
> 
> <quote who="Nicholas Tomlin">
> 
>> Is anybody going Microsoft for copying the Unix multi user environment
>> with their NT, 2000 server and XP platforms?? I know Unix was first at it,
>> 20 plus years ago when I was at Uni...
> 
> The NT platforms were largely based on VMS design (not code), and are wildly
> dissimilar to *nix (though there is a POSIX compatibility layer - which is
> not really all that compatible - and so on). Drawing any &copy; conclusions
> from the fact that two systems provide a similar feature is broken at best
> (and surprisingly similar to what SCO were alleging with regards to IBM's
> contributions to Linux). There are lots of multi-user operating systems
> around, many of them vastly different to NT and *nix platforms...
> 
> Trying to follow the MS conspiracy lines too far will drive you (and every
> one who has to listen) up the wall. :-)
> 
> - Jeff
> 
> -- 
> GVADEC 2004: Kristiansand, Norway                    http://2004.guadec.org/
> 
>  "People keep asking me why we aren't married, and he says, 'Every time
>  I am about to ask you, you do something annoying'." - Kate Beckinsale
> -- 
> SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
> Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
> 

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

Reply via email to